I deliberately set my new Polaroid digital camera on lowest resolution so I could compare Hi Res and Lo Res pictures and had a friend snap me in the hall. It has a sort of haunting quality about it. The high resolution photos are clear and crisp and take forever to transmit over dial up connections.
LO-RES CHUCK
I'm Glad to see a face that goes with the journal , great pic , thanks!
ReplyDeleteYes kind of haunting :) now where is the high res???
ReplyDeleteDeb
A great picture, Chuck!! Now, to get it going with the new laptop!
ReplyDeleteJackie
Hi Chuck ~waving!~ Nice pic! xox
ReplyDeletehttp://journals.aol.com/valphish/ValsThoughts
I do like the picture, but here's a suggestion. Take a picture at a reasonably high resolution - not the max possible, but not low. I take them 2272x1704 pixels. Then use some kind of free photo software (I use Microsoft Photo Editor, mostly) to clean it up (I love Autocorrect!). Then I resize it to no more than 500x375 pixels. That doesn't take forever to upload, and it looks good online. If you do low res to start with, you don't have as good a file to work with.
ReplyDeleteHave fun!
Karen
Hi Chuck!! Nice to see you! Blessings, Penny http://journals.aol.com/firestormkids04/FromHeretoThere
ReplyDeletethere's good o'l Chuck. Nice respectable looking guy. " )
ReplyDeleteI always like seeing the faces of the people in the journals. mark
ReplyDeleteyou look spookey lol
ReplyDeleteDonna In TEXAS