Tuesday, January 31, 2006

First Picture with new Digital Camera - Low Resolution

   I deliberately set my new Polaroid digital camera on lowest resolution so I could compare Hi Res and Lo Res pictures and had a friend snap me in the hall. It has a sort of haunting quality about it.  The high resolution photos are clear and crisp and take forever to transmit over dial up connections.

       LO-RES CHUCK

9 comments:

garnett109 said...

I'm Glad to see a face that goes with the journal , great pic , thanks!

jckfrstross said...

Yes kind of haunting :) now where is the high res???

Deb

bamawmn46 said...

A great picture, Chuck!!  Now, to get it going with the new laptop!
Jackie

valphish said...

Hi Chuck ~waving!~ Nice pic! xox
http://journals.aol.com/valphish/ValsThoughts

mavarin said...

I do like the picture, but here's a suggestion.  Take a picture at a reasonably high resolution - not the max possible, but not low.  I take them 2272x1704 pixels.  Then use some kind of free photo software (I use Microsoft Photo Editor, mostly) to clean it up (I love Autocorrect!).  Then I resize it to no more than 500x375 pixels.  That doesn't take forever to upload, and it looks good online.  If you do low res to start with, you don't have as good a file to work with.

Have fun!

Karen

firestormkids04 said...

Hi Chuck!!  Nice to see you!  Blessings, Penny  http://journals.aol.com/firestormkids04/FromHeretoThere

hunybea4him said...

there's good o'l Chuck. Nice respectable looking guy. " )

mtrib2 said...

I always like seeing the faces of the people in the journals.    mark

lacaza3 said...

you look spookey lol
Donna In TEXAS